Recently I was told that because students don't know "how much kihon they will have to do" and don't know when it will end...that they
"save themselves" and "coast"..and hence do not give every technique 100%
Moley,
Who is the culprit?
I understand both ways of thinking here, but tend to agree with you Moley; some students are frightened that if they don't conserve their energy at the begining of the lesson during Kihon, that they will be unable to carry on during the kumite, and probably get 'knocked around a bit'.
The Takushoku training method has indeed produced some of the best JKA instructors in the world, and we at Seki have had the privallage of getting an insight into it from an ex-Takushoku student (Hooper Sempai).
The names of ex-Takushoku students reads like the 'who's who' of the Karate world, people like Nakayama, Nishiama, Sugiura, Okasaki, Enoeda, Kawasoe, Osaka, Omura, Akita etc. etc. etc. so I don't think that there is anything wrong with the training method.
I think that what we should do is adopt another Taku-dai strategy to 'encourage' students to try harder and not coast, what about the one that Matsumi sensei used on Akita? or the one where 'light' Kumite is practiced before and after training (I think that this would do Gizmo a world of good).
Something to look forward to in the new year
